Perceived Internal Union Democracy And Union Cynicism: Evidence From Union-Member Public Officials in Türkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20573598Anahtar Kelimeler:
Internal Union Democracy- Union Cynicism- Union Representation- Public OfficialsÖzet
This study examines the relationship between perceived internal union democracy and union cynicism among union-member public officials in Muğla (Türkiye). Using a cross-sectional survey design, data were collected online from members affiliated with different unions (N = 236). Perceived internal union democracy and union cynicism were measured using established scales, and hypotheses were tested via Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. The results indicate a strong, negative association between internal union democracy and overall union cynicism (r = −0.787, p < .01). Regression analyses further show that internal union democracy explains a substantial proportion of variance in cynicism (R² = 0.619), with a stronger association for the cognitive-affective component (R² = 0.670) than for the behavioural component (R² = 0.077). These findings suggest that the effective functioning of internal union democracy-reflected in transparency, participation, and accountability-may play a critical role in limiting members’ distrust and negative orientations towards unions. The study contributes to debates on union legitimacy and highlights the importance of democratic mechanisms for sustaining union-member relations.
Referanslar
Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269-292.
Akkaya, Y. (2004). “Globalisation” versus de-unionisation and impoverishment. Çalışma ve Toplum Journal, 3(3), 93-122.
Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.
Aydın, M. (2017). The impact of the act on trade unions and collective labour agreements no 6356 on the realization of democracy within trade unions, İş ve Hayat Journal, 2(4), 9-58.
Çelik, A. (2006). New problem areas, trends, and searches. In F. Sazak (Ed.), The union crisis and union searches in Türkiye, (pp. 17-74). Epos.
Chacko, T. I. (1985). Member participation in union activities: Perceptions of union priorities, performance, and satisfaction. Journal of Labor Research, 6(4), 363-373.
Coşkun, R., Altunışık, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. & Yıldırım, E. (2015). Research methods in social sciences: SPSS applications (8th ed.). Sakarya Press.
Dean, J. W., Jr., Brandes, P., & Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 341-352.
Demirdizen, D., & Lordoğlu, K. (2013, October). Intra-union democracy in Turkey: A structural and operational analysis regarding intra-union democracy [Paper presentation]. V. National Symposium on Social Rights, Bursa, Turkey.
Dereli, B. (1971). The theoretical foundations of union democracy. Istanbul Journal of Economics, 31(1-4), 97-118.
Etci, H. (2020). Perceptions of unions and Generation Y in the deadlock of union crisis: The case of Eskişehir. Ekin Press.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Oriental Press.
Geçkil, T., & Tikici, M. (2015). A study on developing the organizational democracy scale. Amme İdaresi Journal, 48(4), 41-78.
Gumbrell-McCormick, R., & Hyman, R. (2013). Trade unions in Western Europe: Hard times, hard choices. Oxford University Press.
Güven, E. (2021). The relationship between intra-union democracy and union commitment: The example of Bursa metal industry (Master’s thesis, Uludağ University). YÖK National Thesis Center.
Hammer, T. H., Bayazit, M., & Wazeter, D. L. (2009). Union leadership and member attitudes: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 392-410.
Himarios, J. S. (1988). Determinants of labor union members’ satisfaction with their unions (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University).
Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European trade unionism: Between market, class and society. Sage.
International Labour Office. (2005). Governance in employers’ organizations: Designing and implementing sound governance practices (The Effective Employers’ Organization, Guide 1). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Kalağan, G. (2009). The relationship between research assistants’ perceived organizational support and organizational cynicism (Unpublished master’s thesis, Akdeniz University).
Karasar, N. (2002). Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques. Nobel Press.
Karcıoğlu, F., & Balkaya, E. (2018). Relationship between union membership, union satisfaction and job insecurity: An application on research assistants. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, (75), 307-326.
Kayır, G., & Göksu, M. (2025). An analysis of organizational commitment, civil society perceptions, and union attitudes of teachers in Türkiye. Discover Education, 4(462), 1-19.
Kazar, E. N., & Tosun, F. (2022). A research on the determination of trade union commitment levels of academic staff in Turkey. Çalışma ve Toplum Journal, 2(73), 1123-1148.
Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilization, collectivism and long waves. Routledge.
Keser, A., Yılmaz, G., & Köse, S. (2014). Antecedents of union commitment in Turkish food and transportation sector. Çalışma ve Toplum Journal, 1(40), 85-102.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Lipset, S. M., Trow, M., & Coleman, J. S. (1956). Union democracy: The internal politics of the International Typographical Union. Free Press.
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing-out of Western democracy. Verso.
Michels, R. (1915). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Hearst’s International Library.
Millioğulları Kaya, Ö. (2017). A field research on the union commitment. Çalışma ve Toplum Journal, 4(55), 2055-2078.
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (S. Özge, Trans.). Siyasal Press.
Öztürk, M. (2013). The importance of trade-union democracy in terms of collective action. Suleyman Demirel University The Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 18(2), 269-285.
Pérez de Guzmán, S., Roca, B., & Díaz-Parra, I. (2016). Political exchange, crisis of representation and trade union strategies in a time of austerity: Trade unions and 15M in Spain. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 22(4), 461-474.
Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331-369.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
Şafak, K., Yeşiltaş, A., & Şafak, Ş. (2023). A field research on the trade union commitment of the health sector workers. Journal of Nazilli Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 4(1), 93-103.
Sipahi, İ. (2016). Oligarchy as a trade union default setting: A structural re-examination of union democracy in Turkey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, (71), 99-126.
Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS (5th ed.). Nobel Press.
Tetrick, L. E., Shore, L. M., McClurg, L. N., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2007). A model of union participation: The impact of perceived union support, union instrumentality, and union loyalty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 820-828.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.
Uçkan Hekimler, B. (2017). Internal and external motives of negative union perception in Turkey. Journal of Social Policy Conferences], (68), 127-154.
Uçkan Hekimler, B., & Kağnıcıoğlu, D. (2009). Workers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the trade unions: The case of Eskişehir. Çalışma ve Toplum Journal, 3(22), 35-56.
Urhan, B., & Selamoğlu, A. (2008). Workers’ attitudes and behaviours towards the trade unions; The case of Kocaeli. Çalışma ve Toplum Journal, 3(18), 171-197.
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as distinct constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2026 International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
The Author(s) must make formal transfer of copyright for each article prior to publication in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences. Such transfer enables the Journal to defend itself against plagiarism and other forms of copyright infringement. Your cooperation is appreciated. You agree that copyright of your article to be published in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences is hereby transferred, throughout the World and for the full term and all extensions and renewals thereof, to International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences.
The Author(s) reserve(s): (a) the trademark rights and patent rights, if any, and (b) the right to use all or part of the information contained in this article in future, non-commercial works of the Author's own, or, if the article is a "work-for-hire" and made within the scope of the Author's employment, the employer may use all or part of the information contained in this article for intra-company use, provided the usual acknowledgements are given regarding copyright notice and reference to the original publication.
The Author(s) warrant(s) that the article is Author's original work, and has not been published before. If excerpts from copyrighted works are included, the Author will obtain written permission from the copyright owners and shall credit the sources in the article. The author also warrants that the article contains no libelous or unlawful statements, and does not infringe on the rights of others. If the article was prepared jointly with other Author(s), the Author agrees to inform the co-Author(s) of the terms of the copyright transfer and to sign on their behalf; or in the case of a "work-for-hire" the employer or an authorized representative of the employer.
The journal is registered with the ISSN : 1925-4423.
IJCEAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
