The Moderating Role of Marital Status in the Effect of Psychological Ownership on Organizational Identification Mediated by Presenteeism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21002597Anahtar Kelimeler:
Psychological Ownership- Organizational Identification- Presenteeism- Moderating Role of Marital StatusÖzet
This study investigates whether marital status shapes the association between psychological ownership and organizational identification, considering presenteeism as an intervening mechanism. A survey was conducted with 386 employees working in various health institutions in Konya. The instruments were validated through exploration factor analysis and reliability analyses. Hypotheses were tested using Hayes’ PROCESS Macro framework. Findings revealed that psychological ownership significantly contributes to organizational identification. The results further indicate a conditional indirect effect through presenteeism. In addition, marital status was found to significantly moderate this indirect effect, indicating a moderated mediation relationship.
Referanslar
Akbar, F., Ahmad, I., Ali, Z., & Naz, A. (2019). Assessing the effect of demographic variables on organizational citizenship behavior & organizational justice. Clinical Social Work, 10, 7–18.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Aronsson, G., & Gustafsson, K. (2005). Sickness presenteeism: Prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 47(9), 958–966. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000177219.75677.17
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bartels, J., Pruyn, A., de Jong, M., & Joustra, I. (2007). Multiple organizational identification levels and the impact of perceived external prestige and communication climate. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.420
Baxter, W., Aurisicchio, M., & Childs, P. R. N. (2015). A psychological ownership approach to designing object attachment. Journal of Engineering Design, 26(4–6), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1030371
Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.229
Biron, C., Karanika-Murray, M., & Ivers, H. (2022). The health-performance framework of presenteeism: A proof-of-concept study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1029434. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029434
Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83
Brown, G., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2014). Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12048
Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2005). Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.17293710
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
Caverley, N., Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2007). Sickness presenteeism, sickness absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization. Journal of Management Studies, 44(2), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00690.x
Çiftçi, D. Ö., Meriç, E., & Meriç, A. (2018). Presenteeism (işte var olamama) ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. The Journal of Social Sciences (Sobider), (24), 213-225
Coşkun, Ö. (2012). İki işyerinde işe devamsızlık ve kendini işe verememede etkili faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi [Doctoral dissertation, Ankara University]. Ankara University Institute of Health Sciences.
Dalkılıç, E. (2017). Stanford işte var olamama ölçeğinin Türkçede geçerlik ve güvenirliği: Hemşireler üzerinde bir araştırma [Master's thesis, Istanbul University]. Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences.
Dawkins, S., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Martin, A. (2017). Psychological ownership: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2057
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hox, J. (2009). Present but sick: A three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Development International, 14(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910933574
Demirkaya, H., & Şimşek Kandemir, A. (2014). 21. yüzyılın anahtar rekabet faktörü olan psikolojik sahiplenme üzerine bir işletme incelemesi. Çalışma Dünyası Dergisi, 2(3), 7–22.
Dietz, C., Zacher, H., Scheel, T., Otto, K., & Rigotti, T. (2020). Leaders as role models: Effects of leader presenteeism on employee presenteeism and sick leave. Work & Stress, 34(3), 300–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1728420
Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. Harvester Wheatsheaf; St. Martin's Press.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
Ertürk, E., & Erdirençelebi, M. (2017). Presenteeism (işte var olamama) ile iş yaşam dengesi arasındaki ilişki: Akademik personel üzerine bir araştırma. Balkan Journal of Social Sciences (ICOMEP 2017 Special Issue), 193–203.
Freeling, M., Rainbow, J. G., & Chamberlain, D. (2020). Painting a picture of nurse presenteeism: A multi-country integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 109, Article 103659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103659
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
Gosselin, E., Lemyre, L., & Corneil, W. (2013). Presenteeism and absenteeism: Differentiated understanding of related phenomena. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030932
Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (5. baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Hansen, C. D., & Andersen, J. H. (2008). Going ill to work—What personal circumstances, attitudes and work-related factors are associated with sickness presenteeism? Social Science & Medicine, 67(6), 956–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.022
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12028
Hemp, P. (2004). Presenteeism: At work—but out of it. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 49–58.
Işık, M., & Uçar, Z. (2019). İş tatmini psikolojik sahiplenme ilişkisinde lider üye etkileşiminin düzenleyicilik etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21(4), 1119–1145. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.506797
Johns, G. (2010). Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.630
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193
Kayış, A. (2010). Güvenilirlik analizi. In Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri (pp. 404–420). Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S., ... Bendel, T. (2002). Stanford presenteeism scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200201000-00004
Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_1
Lu, L., Lin, H.-Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2013). Unhealthy and present: Motives and consequences of the act of presenteeism among Taiwanese employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(4), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034331
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.147.5.477-500
Miraglia, M., & Johns, G. (2016). Going to work ill: A meta-analysis of the correlates of presenteeism and a dual-path model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000015
Mohammadi, N., Darbani, S. A., & Parsakia, K. (2021). The role of psychological capital and career success in marital adjustment. International Journal of Innovation in Management and Organizational Behavior, 1(3), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijimob.1.3.6
Ötken, A. B. (2015). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişki ve bu ilişkide örgütsel adaletin rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 113–140.
Özdemir, F., & Demirci, İ. (2021). Presenteizmin örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi: Adana ilinde faaliyet gösteren yiyecek-içecek işletmeleri üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Turkish Tourism Research, 5(3), 2049–2066. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2021.834
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/259124
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2022). Sağlık istatistikleri yıllığı 2022. https://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR-103184/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2022-
Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
Schaufeli, W. B., & Greenglass, E. R. (2001). Introduction to special issue on burnout and health. Psychology & Health, 16(5), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405523
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 276-293). Nelson-Hall.
Tak, B., & Çiftçioğlu, A. (2009). Algılanan örgütsel prestij ile örgütsel bağlılık ve örgütsel özdeşleşme arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 18, 100–116.
Telman, N., & Aşkun Çelik, D. (2013). Endüstri/örgüt psikolojisi alanında kullanılan ölçekler el kitabı. Nobel Yayıncılık.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
Tutar, H. (2003). Örgütsel iletişim. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2026 International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
The Author(s) must make formal transfer of copyright for each article prior to publication in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences. Such transfer enables the Journal to defend itself against plagiarism and other forms of copyright infringement. Your cooperation is appreciated. You agree that copyright of your article to be published in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences is hereby transferred, throughout the World and for the full term and all extensions and renewals thereof, to International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences.
The Author(s) reserve(s): (a) the trademark rights and patent rights, if any, and (b) the right to use all or part of the information contained in this article in future, non-commercial works of the Author's own, or, if the article is a "work-for-hire" and made within the scope of the Author's employment, the employer may use all or part of the information contained in this article for intra-company use, provided the usual acknowledgements are given regarding copyright notice and reference to the original publication.
The Author(s) warrant(s) that the article is Author's original work, and has not been published before. If excerpts from copyrighted works are included, the Author will obtain written permission from the copyright owners and shall credit the sources in the article. The author also warrants that the article contains no libelous or unlawful statements, and does not infringe on the rights of others. If the article was prepared jointly with other Author(s), the Author agrees to inform the co-Author(s) of the terms of the copyright transfer and to sign on their behalf; or in the case of a "work-for-hire" the employer or an authorized representative of the employer.
The journal is registered with the ISSN : 1925-4423.
IJCEAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
