Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Financial Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21002621Schlagworte:
Artificial intelligence, financial performance, systematic literature review, accounting-based performanceAbstract
This study provides a systematic synthesis of the empirical literature examining the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and firm-level financial performance. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology, the study analyzes 67 peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2025 that meet predefined inclusion criteria. The selection process followed the PRISMA protocol, and the findings were synthesized through thematic analysis. Overall, the reviewed literature indicates a predominantly positive association between AI adoption and financial performance. In particular, AI investments tend to generate more pronounced benefits in the medium to long term, especially in accounting-based performance indicators such as return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and operating profit margins. Market-based performance measures also frequently respond positively to AI initiatives; however, these effects appear to be more contingent on contextual and firm-specific conditions. Nevertheless, several studies report limited or even negative short-term outcomes, largely due to high implementation costs, organizational alignment challenges, and learning-curve effects associated with AI deployment. By integrating the empirical evidence through the lenses of the Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and Information Processing Theory, this study highlights the conditional nature of financial value creation from AI adoption and provides implications for managers and policymakers.
Literaturhinweise
Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Prepp.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. Retrieved from https://josephmahoney.web.illinois.edu/BA545_Fall%202022/Barney%20(1991).pdf.
Benaich, N., & Hogarth, I. (2019). State of AI report 2019. Air Street Press. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RE0I4VMLNoxswXNnleAyoWsWFGeXrz1F/view.
Benzakour,I., Daoud, M., Jabri, N. & Bensouda, M. (2026). AI in Finance: A Strategic Tool for Enhancing Organizational Performance: A Literature Review. In: Motahhir, S., Bossoufi, B., Guerrero, J.M. (eds) Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2025. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-07915-2_49.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brock, J. K., & von Wangenheim, F. (2019). Demystifying AI: What Digital Transformation Leaders Can Teach You about Realistic Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review, 61, 110-134.https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219865226.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. American Economic Review, 106(5), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161016
Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Lund, S., Dahlström, P., Wiesinger, A., & Subramaniam, A. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The next digital frontier? McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved from mgi-skill-shift-automation-and-future-of-the-workforce-may-2018.pdf.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., & Chow, W. S. (2013). IT capability and organizational performance: The roles of business process agility and environmental factors. MIS Quarterly, 23(3), 1-17. DOI:10.1057/ejis.2013.4.
Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R., & Stern, S. (2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 24449. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24449
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S., Bryde, D. J., Giannakis, M., & Foropon, C. R. H. (2020). Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107599.
Fradelos, G. (2026). Finance-Grade Assurance for Agentic AI: Verifiable Governance, Systemic Risk Mitigation, and Sustainability/Compute Accounting Architecture for banks, insurers, and major financial services providers. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.18213959.
Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews? Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378.
Hoque, H. &Irfan, S. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Investment and Firm Growth Strategy. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=5434829 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5434829.
Huang, M.-H., Rust, R. T., & Maksimovic, V. (2019). Managing in the Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI). California Management Review 61(4), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619863436.
Kawadkar, H. (2026). AI Adoption in Accounting and Finance: Impact on Organizational Performance. Asian Journal of Economics. Business and Accounting, 26(1), 421-428. DOI: 10.9734/ajeba/2026/v26i12151.
Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2022). Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing – Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies. Technovation, 110, 102375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375.
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009.
Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J. C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350775.
Lim, T. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and artificial intelligence in finance: State-of-the-art and research takeaways. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57 (76), 1-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2057405.
Masod, M.Y. B.&Zakaria, S. F. Z. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the Manufacturing Sector: Challenges and Strategic Framework. International Journal of Research and İnnovation in Social Science (IJRISS), VIII(X), 150-158. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.81000013.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Morina, F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence In Stock Markets: Implications For Volatility, Market Liquidity, And Investment Returns. International Journal, 73(1), 35-40. Retrieved from https://ojs.ikm.mk/index.php/kij/article/view/7883.
Oldemeyer, L., Jede, A. &Teutuberg, F. (2025). Influence of company size and AI implementation challenges in manufacturing companies. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 15 (42), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-025-00446-3.
Pantelis, K. (2025). Conditional Gains: When AI Investment Enhances Firm Efficiency. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/124246/1/MPRA_paper_124246.pdf.
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717.
Pluskota, P., Slupinska, K., Wawrzyniak, A. &Wasikowska, B. (2026). The Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Implementation of ESG-Oriented Sustainable Development Strategies in the Banking Sector: A Case Study. Sustainability, 18, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020732.
Ransbotham, S., Kiron, D., Gerbert, P., & Reeves, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence in business gets real. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(4), 1–9. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/artificial-intelligence-in-business-gets-real/.
Tan, J., S. Chang, Y. Zheng& K. C. Chan. (2025). Effects of artificial intelligence in the modern business: Client artificial intelligence application and audit quality. International Review of Financial Analysis, 104(PA),104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104271.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Akter, S., Ren, S. J., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2017). Big data analytics and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.009.
Wang, L. & Chen, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Review, 68, 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2025.101314.
Yang, G. & Yang, X. (2025). AI adoption and ESG performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104659.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
The Author(s) must make formal transfer of copyright for each article prior to publication in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences. Such transfer enables the Journal to defend itself against plagiarism and other forms of copyright infringement. Your cooperation is appreciated. You agree that copyright of your article to be published in the International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences is hereby transferred, throughout the World and for the full term and all extensions and renewals thereof, to International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences.
The Author(s) reserve(s): (a) the trademark rights and patent rights, if any, and (b) the right to use all or part of the information contained in this article in future, non-commercial works of the Author's own, or, if the article is a "work-for-hire" and made within the scope of the Author's employment, the employer may use all or part of the information contained in this article for intra-company use, provided the usual acknowledgements are given regarding copyright notice and reference to the original publication.
The Author(s) warrant(s) that the article is Author's original work, and has not been published before. If excerpts from copyrighted works are included, the Author will obtain written permission from the copyright owners and shall credit the sources in the article. The author also warrants that the article contains no libelous or unlawful statements, and does not infringe on the rights of others. If the article was prepared jointly with other Author(s), the Author agrees to inform the co-Author(s) of the terms of the copyright transfer and to sign on their behalf; or in the case of a "work-for-hire" the employer or an authorized representative of the employer.
The journal is registered with the ISSN : 1925-4423.
IJCEAS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This license lets others distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. This is the most accommodating of licenses offered. Recommended for maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.
